By: Car­rie Bay 08/23/2010

Despite the con­tin­ued efforts of mort­gage giants Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac to find sus­tain­able work­outs for delin­quent bor­row­ers – and the fact that their loan­mod­i­fi­ca­tion activ­ity has indeed increased sig­nif­i­cantly this year – the ana­lysts at Stan­dard & Poor’s (S&P) expect the GSEs’ fore­clo­sure inven­to­ries to con­tinue to swell.

The two com­pa­nies have each already com­pleted about 40 per­cent more work­out vol­ume dur­ing the first half of 2010 than they did in all of 2009 by S&P’s esti­mates. Still, the rat­ings agency says annu­al­ized loan work­out activ­ity (as a per­cent­age of exist­ing delin­quent loans) remains less than half at both insti­tu­tions.  In addi­tion, S&P reports that fore­clo­sure alter­na­tives, such as short sales and deeds-in-lieu, have declined to about 15 per­cent of the work­outs, com­pared with the low 20-percentile range of 2009.

“We believe that the slow and ardu­ous sin­gle loan-by-loan work­out process, per­sis­tently weak national eco­nomic con­di­tions, and high unem­ploy­ment will likely lead to higher fore­clo­sures, result­ing in a fore­clo­sure pipeline that we believe will con­tinue to grow well into 2011,” S&P said in report issued last week.

S&P adds that time­lines for delin­quency and default are being length­ened by poli­cies cur­rently in place and the GSEs’ man­date to pre­vent avoid­able fore­clo­sures. The grow­ing work­out pipelines will “result in actual real­iza­tion of embed­ded credit losses dur­ing the next three to five years,” the agency’s ana­lysts said.

S&P is hold­ing to its down­beat out­look when it comes to the GSEs’ fore­clo­sure num­bers even though the rat­ings agency says credit qual­ity is sta­bi­liz­ing for Fan­nie and Fred­die.   The firm’s ana­lysts con­cede that bet­ter under­writ­ing is likely to sup­port stronger per­for­mance of the more recent 2009 and 2010 vin­tage mort­gages, but both Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac are expected “to con­tinue to record sig­nif­i­cant credit losses” from their 2005–2008 loans.

On a com­bined basis, the com­pa­nies have a $4.7 tril­lion single-family guar­an­tee port­fo­lio, of which 23 per­cent is from the most prob­lem­atic 2006 and 2007 vin­tages, S&P points out. These vin­tages have sig­nif­i­cantly higher delin­quency rates, and also gen­er­ated about two-thirds of the 2010 total credit losses (year to-date) at each company.

The GSEs have already recorded sig­nif­i­cant losses as they work out their large inven­to­ries of defaulted loans, and S&P says the defi­cien­cies will likely keep on com­ing, as evi­denced by the fact that both com­pa­nies con­tinue to carry “a siz­able reserve for embed­ded losses in pre-2009 port­fo­lio vintages.”

Accord­ing to S&P, Fan­nie Mae recorded $120 bil­lion in credit-related expenses (loan-loss pro­vi­sions plus fore­clo­sure expenses) between the begin­ning of 2008 and the sec­ond quar­ter of 2010. Fred­die Mac recorded $57.9 bil­lion in credit-related expenses dur­ing the same period.

S&P did note, how­ever, that each of Fan­nie and Freddie’s second-quarter losses nar­rowed and credit showed some signs of sta­bi­liza­tion through slightly lower seri­ous delin­quency rates. Fan­nie Mae’s seri­ously delin­quent rate was 4.99 per­cent in Q2. Fred­die Mac’s came in at 3.96 percent.

For every one fore­closed prop­erty Fan­nie dis­posed of in Q2, S&P says the GSE repos­sessed 1.39 homes. Freddie’s ratio was one dis­po­si­tion to 1.32 new REOs.

: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to captcha.securitystronghold.com:80 (Connection timed out) in /home/content/f/m/w/fmwebhost/html/chattel/wp-content/plugins/ironclad-captcha-wp-plugin/ironclad_captcha_lib.php on line 45