Writ­ten By: Lor­raine Ash

First-time fore­clo­sure fil­ings in New Jer­sey dropped 5.2 per­cent last year com­pared with 2009. Good news? Hardly.

It’s a false read,” said Jeff Otteau, a hous­ing mar­ket ana­lyst whose East Brunswick-based Otteau Val­u­a­tion Group cal­cu­lated the number.

There are not fewer peo­ple in dan­ger of los­ing their homes, accord­ing to Otteau. In fact, 70,598 New Jer­sey homes were repos­sessed by banks last year, accord­ing to Real­ty­Trac, which pre­dicts a repeat per­for­mance this year.

What’s hap­pen­ing, Otteau said, is that more banks, fac­ing claims of care­less doc­u­men­ta­tion, are decid­ing to hold off on start­ing fore­clo­sures. They’re not fil­ing against delin­quent home­own­ers until they get their own houses in order.

Fore­clo­sure fil­ings are, in a word, stalled in the prover­bial pipeline. The prob­lem likely will linger longer in New Jer­sey than in other states for two rea­sons, accord­ing to Otteau, who pointed out the Gar­den State lost 33,000 pri­vate and gov­ern­ment jobs last year.

The coun­try gained 900,000 pri­vate and gov­ern­ment jobs in 2010,” he said. “If New Jer­sey had moved at the national pace, it should have seen a cor­re­spond­ing gain of 27,000 jobs in 2010. But it didn’t. When peo­ple are con­tin­u­ing to lose their income in our state, there’s no rea­son for fore­clo­sures to improve.”

Sec­ond, New Jer­sey is one of the slow­est states in the coun­try when it comes to “cur­ing” fore­clo­sures — bring­ing them to com­ple­tion — pri­mar­ily because it processes them in the courts.

Since Decem­ber of last year, the courts have delayed the process even more. That’s when the state Supreme Court, respond­ing to reports of sloppy doc­u­men­ta­tion on the part of banks, issued a show cause order direct­ing six lenders and ser­vice providers to prove their paper­work is cor­rect before any fore­clo­sure cases pro­ceed. The lenders — Bank of Amer­ica, JPMor­gan Chase, Citi Res­i­den­tial Lend­ing, GMAC (Ally Finan­cial), OneWest Bank, Wells Fargo — col­lec­tively filed 29,000 fore­clo­sure cases in the state last year. A hear­ing is sched­uled for March 29, accord­ing to the state Admin­is­tra­tive Office of the Courts.

The court essen­tially said: “If you guys can’t jus­tify your fore­clo­sure prac­tice to us, we’re going to shut down all fore­clo­sures in New Jer­sey until you fig­ure out this mess,’ ” said Erik W. Mueller, real estate attor­ney in Ocean Town­ship in Mon­mouth County.

If they really stop the fore­clo­sures alto­gether, it could take another year to process one,” he added. “Now it’s typ­i­cally a two-year process, mean­ing peo­ple are liv­ing in their home for two years with­out mak­ing payments.”

Mueller said he already has rep­re­sented clients who have gone four years with­out mak­ing mort­gage pay­ments before their fore­clo­sure was cured, or completed.

Cures include a sheriff’s sale; a short sale in which a lender approves a third party buy­ing the home for less than what the lender is owed; or a loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion that allows the home­owner to stay in his home and avoid fore­clo­sure. A home­owner also could nego­ti­ate with his lender to sim­ply return the deed to the house back to the lender, a process called “deed in lieu of foreclosure.”

Help on loans

The fed­eral gov­ern­ment encour­ages loan mod­i­fi­ca­tions with its Home Afford­able Mod­i­fi­ca­tion Pro­gram (HAMP), which began on March 4, 2009, and ends Dec. 31, 2012. HAMP offers banks incen­tives to help home­own­ers who owe up to $729,750 on their first mort­gage by reduc­ing their monthly pay­ments to no more than 31 per­cent of their ver­i­fied monthly pre-tax income.

But hopes that Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s pro­gram would help some 4 mil­lion dis­tressed home­own­ers have not been real­ized. A HAMP mod­i­fi­ca­tion does not move from trial to per­ma­nent sta­tus until three con­sec­u­tive pay­ments have been made. Accord­ing to a March 4 arti­cle in Amer­i­can Banker, at the end of Jan­u­ary a total of 539,493 mod­i­fi­ca­tions were per­ma­nent, less by far than the 740,240 can­celed due to fail­ure to make payments.

HAMP is good but imper­fect, accord­ing to Mueller. For instance, it takes a year or more to process a loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion in the program.

Before HAMP, you’d go to the bank and hope for the best. There were no guide­lines,” he said. “The Obama guide­lines are straight­for­ward, but banks don’t come up with answers quickly at all. They lose half your stuff and you have to re-send it two or three times. You don’t qual­ify because they put in num­bers incor­rectly. They lose your file and you have to start over again.”

Any mis­take a bank finds along the way ends in a denial, a real­ity that puts off most peo­ple, Mueller said. His law office throws denials in the garbage and keeps going. But as months roll by, a home­owner con­tin­ues to fall fur­ther behind in mort­gage payments.

Banks put on a friendly face, but when you really get into the process, it’s hor­ri­ble. It’s a night­mare,” Mueller said. “Some­times a bank will actively pur­sue fore­clo­sure while the bor­rower is attempt­ing to mod­ify a loan. In that sit­u­a­tion it cer­tainly appears that the bank is not act­ing in good faith.”

One Boon­ton Town­ship home­owner who has gone through the HAMP process twice — and been rejected both times — needs no con­vinc­ing that the sys­tem is frus­trat­ing. She applied to Bank of Amer­ica because going from 8.9 per­cent on her mort­gage to 4 or 5 per­cent would have enabled her to keep her home.

I just stopped being able to pay the mort­gage in April 2010 and started apply­ing for mod­i­fi­ca­tion,” she said. “It took six months. First the bank lost every­thing I sent. I resub­mit­ted and then it kept say­ing it needed “all the paper­work’ but couldn’t tell me what paper­work. I got rejected for not giv­ing the bank what it needed.’ ”

Denials based on miss­ing or lost doc­u­ments occur fre­quently, Mueller said, even when a home­owner has proof a com­plete pack­age was submitted.

On the Boon­ton Town­ship homeowner’s sec­ond try at a loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion, she was rejected for being unemployed.

Now she is bid­ing time. Like so many Amer­i­cans, she gam­bled on the like­li­hood of the real estate bub­ble not burst­ing. She bought the Boon­ton Town­ship home for $350,000 and refi­nanced twice, the sec­ond time in 2007 for $500,000 to cover the costs of the mort­gage as well as liv­ing and busi­ness expenses.

Three years ago the home was worth $579,000. Now its value has dropped by $100,000 and it is no longer worth the amount owed on the mortgage.

It’s weird when you get to this place where you real­ize pay­ing your mort­gage is not the thing to do,” she said. “I’ve worked through that anx­i­ety and dis­il­lu­sion­ment that there’s any­thing per­ma­nent about a mort­gage any­more. Or a house, for that matter.”

Today she is seek­ing a short sale.

Mak­ing it easier

Some banks make loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion eas­ier. A favorite of one fore­clo­sure coun­sel­ing agency is Chase, one of the first banks to par­tic­i­pate in HAMP. At its Chase Home Own­er­ship Cen­ters, home­own­ers meet face-to-face with loan coun­selors to iron a mort­gage mod­i­fi­ca­tion instead of talk­ing by phone.

Since 2009 Chase has opened 51 cen­ters nation­wide, includ­ing two in New Jer­sey, and it plans to open another 20 this year. The New Jer­sey cen­ters are in Para­mus and Jer­sey City.

Nation­wide, the cen­ters helped avoid 487,294 fore­clo­sures since 2009,” said Mike Fusco, Chase spokesman. “We’ve avoided fore­clo­sures twice as often as we’ve had to foreclose.”

Home­own­ers with loans in the seven fig­ures have a unique sit­u­a­tion. One Mor­ris Town­ship fam­ily decided to use the equity that had built up in the large, his­toric home they’d bought 13 years ear­lier at an excel­lent price. The fam­ily doesn’t qual­ify for a HAMP loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion because its loan is worth too much. So far a solu­tion that would save the home eludes them, and a sheriff’s sale is sched­uled for later this month.

The father’s line of work is tied to the build­ing busi­ness. When that indus­try weak­ened, the fam­ily strug­gled to meet the home’s for­mi­da­ble $15,000 monthly oper­a­tional bills in addi­tion to its repair and main­te­nance demands. In 2008 the home was worth upwards of $3 mil­lion, which prompted the fam­ily to take out a sec­ond mort­gage and invest in a night­club ven­ture that promised large returns.

It seemed like we were uti­liz­ing the golden egg we were sit­ting on,” the father said. “We’re sit­ting on all this equity. Why not invest it in a sound invest­ment that pays back bet­ter than what we’re pay­ing for it?”

Except it didn’t, and the fam­ily now is left with two mort­gages, both in foreclosure.

The sce­nario presents the spe­cial prob­lems that come with cur­ing fore­clo­sures in very afflu­ent neigh­bor­hoods. Last year 262 Mor­ris County homes were sold back to a bank or to a third-party buyer at sheriff’s sales, accord­ing to the county sheriff’s office.

I’m not an expert but I do won­der if per­haps noth­ing is going to hap­pen at this sheriff’s sale,” the father said. “Most peo­ple go to a sheriff’s sale and expect to get some­thing cheap and make money on it. Most sales are between $200,000 and $600,000. I can’t see some­body at a sheriff’s sale offer­ing $4 mil­lion for almost any­thing unless it was a $10 mil­lion house.”

Solv­ing the fore­clo­sure prob­lem at all socioe­co­nomic lev­els is key to eco­nomic recov­ery, ana­lysts say. One in four home sales in the last quar­ter of 2010 were fore­closed homes, accord­ing to Peter Miller, syn­di­cated real estate writer. Typ­i­cally, they sold at a 32 per­cent dis­count, drag­ging down the value of other homes.

In New Jer­sey the prob­lem is worst in inner-city mar­kets and fringe mar­kets, which are far from employ­ers, accord­ing to Otteau. “I’m talk­ing about the older stock of hous­ing in urban envi­ron­ments,” he said, “and the fringe mar­kets in sub­ur­ban mar­kets. What they have in com­mon is that they attract the lowest-income home­buyer who also is most at risk in an eco­nomic downturn.”

Mueller, in Mon­mouth County, said he’s done a lot of fore­clo­sures in Nep­tune Town­ship, Nep­tune City and Asbury Park, which are replete with low-end homes.

As soon as the mar­ket dipped, their houses were worth $200,000, $175,000, prob­a­bly $50,000 less than the buyer had paid just a year or two ago,” he said. “In the old days, you could refi­nance, but that’s not an option any­more because there’s no value or equity left in the house.”

New Jer­sey won’t see a gen­uine dip in its fore­clo­sure fil­ings for another year, accord­ing to Otteau, who believes job cre­ation in New Jer­sey will start this year.

: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*